LudicrousSpeed said:
There are verified former Zipper employees on GAF who have said multiple times SOCOM 4 played the way it did because Sony wanted a CoD clone. Of course publishers don't pressure all developers on all games to change their work in various ways. But this one did here. You can continue to point out that probably maybe other pubs would have maybe potentially done the same Sony did to Zipper, but I don't need any maybes or probably or any of that, I have reality on my side. And in Zipper's case, if they were third party instead of owned by Sony, they could have been pressured into changing a game and ending up releasing a turd, but still came back to do other things. See: Fuse with Insomniac. But in Zipper's case being owned by Sony meant they had to change the game and were shut down. I hope that helps, not going to reply to more hypothetical "other pubs too!" stuff. Not sure why you're really arguing here LOL.
|
I see. I take your word on it.
Since I see Sony taking a lot of risk on new IPs I don't think it was a pressure for a clone only for the pressure... but I can accept that it could had been better done.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







