Sony: 'Our 2015 first party lineup was not as strong as we would have liked'

[DonFerrari]

CGI-Quality said:

TruckOSaurus said:

CGI-Quality said:

Bloodborne was certainly the cherry on top, but I wouldn't say that it "saved" anything. Until Dawn, MLB, and The Order were still available (even if people didn't like/want them).

I feel Bloodborne is the only one to achieve the kind of quality I expect out of Sony's exclusives in 2015.

I know most aren't with me on this, but The Order was actually a very well made, quality title (meaning it wasn't broken or non-functional, which is why I'll never understand reviewers handing it 4 & 5/10s). Sure, there were things it lacked, but quality wasn't one of them. 

On the flip-side, neither it nor Bloodborne were solely made by 1st party studios (despite some collaboration). As far as I'm concerened, they haven't even begun to show their hand, which is where 2016 will change everything.

I really liked the game

S.T.A.G.E. said:

Roronaa_chan said:

That's not the criteria you were using, as you had KI S3 (what?) there and were missing many PS4 AAAs. It's your "logic" that one can't "get" because this is what you did:

"Here, let me present X1 AAAs: proceeds to list a few and pads it with one irrelevant DLC update. Now here, let me present PS4 AAAs: proceeds to miss more than half of them."

Its an expansion, but I get your point. Regardless, as a person who prefers Sony more and knows Sony's future potential, Microsoft is still pushing Sony to deliver quality IP's in the future by funding new AAA IP's of their own.

Several people have listed a lot more AAA exclusives for Sony and showed that you included non AAA things on MS basket to give them the win, but you still insist that MS had the better output. MS isn't pushing any of Sony if we see the sales.