kekrot said:
The whole game was on all discs more or less. The only difference between the discs is the fmv cutscenes, and some extra boss animations on the final disc if I remember correctly. |
Yes, but they easily could've released all discs seperately and nothing of value would've been lost.
drdante said:
Yes, I've played it on PS1. In fact, I've also played Crisis Core, watched Advert Children and Dirge of Cerberus movie. i asked this because they said before that they changed the story a bit by adding more. Could be they intended to do like VII-1, VII-2 and so on. No need to get angry dude, I'm just asking a question. |
I guess they will have their own subtitles, or they'll call it part 2 or whatever. Is that really relevant though?
Nautilus said:
Alot of games back in the PS1 days were separates into multiple discs.Its not an excuse.Gigantic games are all made to fit into one CD, like Witcher 3 and FF15 by the looks of it(they didnt say anything about splitting them up).And I think people wouldnt mind if the physical version had multiple discs.Would even be a nice "easter egg" to the original.The episodic aproach is more money related than sheer density of the game |
It's not about making excuses. As far as I care they could make it 10 games. It's just that so many people are doubting the method and are asking how it's possible to split the game on multiple releases when it's the exact thing that Square has done in the past and was just recently doing with FFXIII.
If anything Square Enix is probably the single developer with the most experince in doing mult part releases. So people asking the stupid question of if or how it's possible just riles me up.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.








