By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
CGI-Quality said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Sony wins the list was regardless of AAA's though. By that measure they've won every year, but the bar is still AAA's. Sony is known for being the key deverloper of AAA's of the big three. Every gen we get new IP's out of them. Who is it hurting to compare them and hold them up to that standard?

I think the issue is you calling "certain" PS4 games "unsubstantial", while listing other games as "substantial" (by your own metric). 

No. When I say unsubstantial I am not discrediting them in general, but only in the AAA list. When we make lists on VG Chartz the criteria of a strong lineup is usually headlined by AAA IP's. It's been that way since I joined in 2008. 



 

That's not the criteria you were using, as you had KI S3 (what?) there and were missing many PS4 AAAs. It's your "logic" that one can't "get" because this is what you did:

"Here, let me present X1 AAAs: proceeds to list a few and pads it with one irrelevant DLC update. Now here, let me present PS4 AAAs: proceeds to miss more than half of them."