DonFerrari on 14 December 2015
SvennoJ said:
DonFerrari said:
I love this part of feminism studies that all that men excell is either because of patriarchy and opression and need to be demolished and if it's genetics needs to be addressed and made better for women. While any thing women in studies is believed to do better (without real world counterproof because they don't happen on real world and is fault of the patriarchy) it's absolute and undisputable. Funny thing is that those studies do nill in making the world better. While the hideous engineering are always making solutions for a better world.
|
Are you maybe disappointed in Dilma Rousseff?
“Her brain is too small for what’s needed to govern this country,” said Alberto Cerqueira Lima, 72, a marketing consultant who was among the protesters.
That still happens...
In some areas women have a tendency to do better in, same as men have a tendency to do better in other areas. Not all women are better at X or all men are better at Y. And sure, there are enough people around to find enough competent men to do all the tasks, yet why ignore a pool of equally competent people with a diferent view and perhaps more effective solutions to certain situations. http://fortune.com/2015/03/26/the-trait-that-makes-women-great-leaders/
Bias is still a real thing, as in a study I linked earlier on judging creativity between men and women. Same set of ideas, in a blind test, men and women's ideas were judged equally creative. With the sex of the writer known, the men's work was judged as more creative. I've been conditioned by society too at early age. I love reading sci-fi and also enjoyed books by U. K. Le Guin. Always assumed it was written by a man, my brain didn't even consider it was possible that women would write sci-fi.
There have been plenty famous female scientists and leaders in the past to show that females are just as competent as men at these tasks. Did they not make the world better? How much proof do you need?
|
My problem with Dilma isn't because of her gender... I don't supported Lula or FHC before him, so please get the anti-female narrative of my dislike for Dilma, she is incapacited as leader independet of her gender. And a comment from Eneas Carneiro shows it isn't because of gender when he said when talking about Lula "Lula não tem capacidade intracromossomial inata para dirigir um país" (Lula lacks genetical capability to run a country)
The proof I need, is when you say some trait is greater in a gender or race that should translate to similar show in "uncontrolled enviroment", but them you to validate your point show the odd case to say it exist.
