o_O.Q said:
i'm just trying to show you that what you are saying does not hold together logically you are claiming that women are better managers and that is fine i have no problem with that but my question is that if they are better managers or in other words leaders (because that is essentially what a manager is anyway) how did they therefore end up as the ones being lead? i've asked this for about 3 times now and you have not given me an answer yet "Understood that their position was more beneficial to them? lol." this is the only thing that makes sense with regards to what you are telling me
"religion enforcing the roles." religion is a societal management system that came from men btw |
Maybe I'm not understanding what you are asking?
Yes religion was mostly deminated by men and opressed women. The first female priests were not ordained until the seventies in the US, 1994 in the church of England. Witch hunts were documented from before the 1300's to the early 1900's, predominently targeted at women that were out of line.
Maybe you want to know how religion came to be dominated by males? I don't have that answer, I can only speculate.
Women were mostly tied to the cave with short lives taxed by trying to raise kids. While men were out hunting and dealing with neigbouring tribes. Tribal warfare might have been a driving factor in the us against them part during the origin of religion.
Anyway whatever it was in the ancient past that led to the status quo hasn't been relevant for a long time. It's kinda obvious that tribes where the women stayed at home and raised many kids did better than tribes that did not. Blame natural selection.
