| zero129 said: Ok lets look at something this way. Lets say some ceo of some company promises that his drink is the most healty drink in the world no one knows whats in it, but yet people seem to be getting even more sick after drinking the drink then before it. Now one person states that its the drink thats making people sick and anyone who no longer believes this when all proof points to it is in denial. Another person says that he cant blame the drink since the is no prove that it is from the drink and it could just be something else. The first person then states how can you believe its not the drink when no one even knows whats in it. The second person then replys that he does believe it may be the drink but its foolish for the first person to call a small group of people who doesnt believe it being in denial. You see when all proof points to one thing, for others to try saying otherwise is pretty much being in denial since its so hard to deny that FF15 will come to PC at some point. In fact it would be up to them users to proof why the game wont come to PC. |
Poorly constructed analogy on your part ...
You were trying to show an example of correlation implies causation but it does not apply to this case since you lack evidence ...
And the burden of proof is the one who makes the claim so in that case it is YOU who must prove that FFXV will come to PC beyond any reasonable doubt ...
Instinct =/= Proof BTW ...
