Pavolink said:
Different teams.
Okami is a good Zelda game. It had better design than Twilight Princess. Unfortunately, they ruined with the amount of giberish and the final boss. And yes, just HD. Iwata promised that they were ready for HD development since 2011. No excuses for taking so long. If they were really not ready, he should have not promised that. As consumers we demand what we were promised. On top of that, as I mentioned, if making a big Zelda game like the one it is supposed to come next year is going to take so long, the best it's to make the correct decisions to have a good development process. Not just sink for an eternity. |
Lol no, Okami was a charming game but it's design was not even close to any Zelda game, just comparing the bosses, enemies, dungeons, puzzles etc... highlight this, people give it praise because it's a good Zelda clone but if it was released by the Zelda team it would be treated far more harshly.
What were you promised exactly? Just a Zelda game only real issue was the delay, even developers who have more experience in HD aren't releasing games that fast as people demand hardware to be pushed while doing it, Iwata saying they're ready for HD is not making you any promise. Zelda as far as any of us is concerned has a good development process that's why the series has been consistent for 30 years if you have a better idea on every element of design post it now.
