AsGryffynn said:
It's less that I choose the loser on purpose and more like the loser consistently draws me in more than the winner, and nothing... I just pointed out that I'd rather miss good games rather than have them AND bad games... In a way, it's the same thing, but done differently. Rather than having "the good and the bad" I prefer having "the normal, no good or bad" lineup on my console...
|
I understand better now. Thanks.
You can`t control what is released, and no matter the platform there will be bad games launched on it. But sure as hell you aren`t obligated to buy any of them. I still wouldn`t skip a console if it had like 3-10 games I really want to play just because of the amount of garbage launched on it.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
