There are parts that seem to be taken direct from an ANN review. Load of bullshit sounds like "shitload of fuck". You use too much diarrheia and fuck. Analogies are great, but like Twesterm said you should know how to use them to be funny or make them relevant.
This is a shameless rip off:
"Listening to a sick, constipated, rhinoceros, trying to take a diarrhea, would be more enjoyable".
And the end is a little embarrassing if you are trying to be original.
"I just want to get out of here. Look. There's the checkpoint. That must be the exit. This looks familiar. Oh, look. I just went around in a circle.
I just went around in a circle.
This shameful disgrace, is fucking atrocious. It's a monstrous pile of moldy, partially undigested, diarrhea, roasting in the hot sun, bubbling out of the asshole of a dead hippopotamus.
I mean, I'd rather waste my time, taking pictures of every single Star in the Universe, develop them all, then play connect-the-dots with all the stars".
He did that on the TMNT games for the Nes. The exact same pattern.
1) He shows how much time he wasted trying to overcome a obstacle created due to bad design.
2) He pauses for a second when he discover that the solution was simple and not logical.
3) He explodes into a maniacal rage cursing more than someone with Tourrete`s syndrome.
4) Finally, he starts a lot of "I`d rather" comparisons.
Every other ANN wannabe tried it and failed. I`d say drop it.
Not a bad review (I tried to imagine it in video), but you need to polish it. And I liked that Kyrby analogy.
Satan said:
"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."
