By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
Nautilus said:

Of course he is obliged!Its his job to read the whole book to make a fair and good review.he is being paid for it, to do that single job.What are you saying is like if a teacher had a student with difficulty learning something, the teacher should just give up on him?He may in the end fail(the student), but its teachers job to try its best to make the student understand.I was a bit extreme in my example, but I think you got the idea.He can say all he want about the book being bad, but he needs to experience it all to truly say its bad.If you cant handle it, well then, you are in the wrong job(the reviewers in case of course)

He is paid to review the book, not to read all.

Do restaurant critics eat the whole menu to evaluate or ask for their "full course" annd the restaurante chef decides what to serve? If he serves his worst that is his fault alone.


I don't know any book reviewer read 50 pages of the book and say " This book is boring so I gave it a F cause it was boring at the opening ". Err, how about the rest of the book ?

"Don't do anything halfway" , but game reviewer is a diffirence story. They could play it halfway and told us they are not like it. Anyway, it's just different opinions from diffirent persons, why take it so serious if you're enjoying the game ?



 

NNID : ShenlongDK
PSN : DarkLong213