Who made these criteria, they make no sense specialy considering reviewers have been much more strict with the score son this generation. you cant realy compare metascore over the course of like 20 years and use it as a base for a list.
Also we all know Zelda has already reviewed at like 98, its Zelda it has 10 extra points for being Nintendo and another 10 for being Zelda, so if its an 80 ppl will give it 100. Actualy it has another 10 extra points for being Open World, wich is another thing that gives games free extra points on reviewers mind. It has 10 for Nintendo + 10 for Zelda + 10 for Open Worldness.







