So Xenoblade X has an 84 on metacritix because there is too much to do and the world is too big?

[Nautilus]

DonFerrari said:

Nautilus said:

Of course.The book can be horible the first 50 pages, but after that it could developed in a decent or even good book.You wont know until you read at the end.And as a person that wants to know about the book, if you read the preview of that guy that only read the first 50 pages you will think:Ok, the intro is bad, but what about the rest?Couldnt there be a reedeming factor?

I dont think reviewers need to 100% the story per se, but doing the bare minimum is not only unprofessional, but completely wrong.People who do this shouldnt even be called a professional, let alone a  reviewer.

if a book after readingf for 2h haven't enticed you the least would you obligue yourself to read another 100?

You may say it's unfair, unprofessional but it's his true opinion that the book don't deserve to be read

Of course he is obliged!Its his job to read the whole book to make a fair and good review.he is being paid for it, to do that single job.What are you saying is like if a teacher had a student with difficulty learning something, the teacher should just give up on him?He may in the end fail(the student), but its teachers job to try its best to make the student understand.I was a bit extreme in my example, but I think you got the idea.He can say all he want about the book being bad, but he needs to experience it all to truly say its bad.If you cant handle it, well then, you are in the wrong job(the reviewers in case of course)