So Xenoblade X has an 84 on metacritix because there is too much to do and the world is too big?

[Nautilus]

Hynad said:

Nautilus said:

No, Im saying that by what they imply, that the carachters dont have depth and that the story in general seems simple,but that would be somewhat fixed if they did most of the affinity missions.But I agree thats a reasonable point to critic.

Its just that reading many of the "bad" reviews, most of them seem to not care to give the necessary effort to truly understand the game or understand its mechanics, or the reviewers were ones that simply dont like JRPGs to begin with.Wished they took more time with the games to try and do all they could before releasing the review, but alas.

But of course!

Every good review of the game = That's on the game's effort.

Every "bad" review = It's the reviewer's fault.


Doesn't seem like a biased way to see things one bit.

In most cases I would agree with you.But reading through the reviews this game seem like it had alot of mediocre reviews.Dont get me wrong:Its not all of them that are badly done.Some of the ones that gave a lower score were right to do so, because he didnt like the game after he had experienced it all and truly felt that the game were missing in some points.When the reviewer dedicates himself to play the game and gives it a lower score than others, thats perfectly fine.But there were some reviewers that saying that killing weak monsters took too long, or that the combat system were all automated(implying there was no strategy and the like), which simply isnt true.Those are the reviews im mad about.85 is an excellent score, but I felt that it should have scored a little higher.Will buy this day 1 regardless, but I like to see a game get the recognition when it deserves