Bofferbrauer said: And I've got a 5770, even worse Not listing Titan but listing Fury due to the initial pricepoint is silly imo. Also, NVidia has put the lower Maxwell chips into the GeForce 700 lineup for some reason, so you would have to add 745, 750 and 750Ti. As a result, AMD only would have 1 card more than NVidia, and imo that's the Nano, as it caters for a very special market (powerful mini PCs) where NVidia has no equivalent card. |
We're both in need of an upgrade.
I forgot about the 7x0 seris Maxwell cards, it's true and I admit my mistake, but that doesn't change anything because I also haven't listed the R5 230, R7 240 and R7 250, and the main problem still remains: AMD still has too many cards in the mid to high end of the market. They should get rid of the non-X variants and simplify its lineup.
And if I haven't listed the Titan X is for its price and because they are refered as a prosumer card. And I don't know what Fury has to do with it as it's priced as the 980Ti, which is its main competition.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.