By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo on 02 December 2015
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Well every 3D Zelda game is still very high quality game that is always one of the best games of generation, also its totally bug free and without any problems like bad fps or similar. How many blockbuster games like that with 3 year development cycles we have on market, or how many game like that at all we have on market!? There is a reason why Zelda series manage to have high quality games for 30th years.

I agree that 5 years is little too much for new 3D Zelda, but while Nintendo still deleriving what is expected from 3D Zelda, I cant complain too much, but surely I would love if Nintendo could manage to deliver 3D Zelda in 3-4 years and if that dont effect on quality of game.

Off the top of my head, Uncharted 2 and 3 both arrived two years after their predecessors, and launched without major framerate issues or bug problems, at least that I'm aware of. Now, I don't expect Zelda to take two years, but as you say, 3-4 should be perfectly reasonable.

Well there is huge difference between Uncharted 2 and 3 and Zelda 3D series, first Uncharted 2 and 3 are linear action games, U2 and U3 are using same engine and they certainly could reused some models and textures, also it's basically just a sequel without almost any new staffs they just needed new story. On other hand Zelda 3D series is not linear at all (except SS) and they are open world adventure games, evry Zelda 3D game (exept MM) is using totally different art style and graphic, and evry 3D Zelda games gives totally new staffs and mechanics. 3D Zelda game is much more on pair with games like Skyrim or Fallout.

That's why I said that Nintendo could make new Zelda game in 2-3 years only if they pull MM again, and I hope they can manage completely new Zelda in 3-4 years but I am not sure.