By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zuvuyeay said:
binary solo said:

It doesn't meet the PSN+ minimum metascore criteria, so technically it should never be one of the PSN+ games of the month. I guess we'll see if Sony decides to bend the rules in the case of their own AAA titles. It would finally be a AAA retail PS4 title that makes it on to PSN+ at least.


seems like a stupid rule,some of us like bad games or games reviewers might not dig,

hopefully they give it to us,vgc can have some threads about it

or they'll just have it for free for a month or charge a nominal fee of  1 pound for a month for plussers, can that get round the meta problem

$10 on PSN USA seems pretty nominal, though if they gave PSN+ subscribers a 60% discount on that $10 it would be about as close as you could get to being a PSN+ free game of the month without actually being a free game of the month. And what's better is that unlike actual PSN+ free games of the month you would actually own the game outright and it sould still be playable if you cancelled your PSN+ sub.

Damnit! I don't remember seeing a boob, I'll have to replay the game.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix