Garcian Smith on 10 May 2008
insomniac17 said:
Yeah, that sounds exactly like mine. |
The problem with this sort of review system is that it doesn't take into account value. You may say "don't buy" to a game that's too short, or too shallow, or too bereft of features for $50, but the game might be a good value once it drops to $20.
"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."
-Sean Malstrom
