ganoncrotch said:
I wonder is the bolded True? Like do you think people who just have a single brand are the Majority, I can't really picture myself being locked into a single brand... like say if you enjoy Playstation games that's fine, but if you also sit down and play through Halo does that mean you have less fun with your Playstation games afterwards or you can't play Tetris on the bog without taking from the other 2 systems? :o odd logic. I'm not saying you're incorrect, just wondering are there more people out there who would rather miss out on great games because they happen to be on a "Rival" console to the main one they love tho. Or are there more people who just play games regardless of the box in front of their TV (can also put a PC there! simmer down :D ) |
By the statistics of 7th gen, and possibily this gen as well... if we are talking only about the 3 platforms, most gamers are single platforms in the gen (but not tied with one brand forever, as you can see the migration from PS2->X360->PS4... I believe it was like 1/3 of gamers had 2 or 3 platforms on the gen (7th gen)

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







