Kotaku claims to be blacklisted by Bethesda and Ubisoft

[mountaindewslave]

mornelithe said:

binary solo said:

Did you watch the video? Of course the publishers have the choice, that's not the issue. The issue is whether blacklisting is a helpful or harmful tactic in the broader scheme of things and whether us as the ultimate source of the profits for game companies are well served by publishers thinking they can blacklist media outlets for whatever reason they want. You might be able to argue that this blacklisting was somewhat justified, but blacklisting has been done for some very dodgy reasons, bad reviews, and the more publishers think they can blacklist with gamers on their side the more they will do it and the worse off we'll be.

It's kind of ironic that people who supported the so-called aims of #GG regarding journalistic ethics (which basically amounts to media colluding with publishers to give good press for games) are basically in support of this tactic, which is exactly one way for game companies to exert pressure on gaming media to give good press. The threat of blacklisting puts gaming media on notice to be more positive towards the publishers.

Blacklisting is generaly an abusive practice and gamers should be generally opposed to it, regardless of what they think about the behaviour of the media outlet concerned. Kotaku may be a rare case where it is justified. But I tend to err on the side of being highly sceptical about the companies doing the blacklisting because business trying to control the media is a dangerous thing for the consumer.

Why would I watch a video of someone who supports Doxxing?   His opinions are irrelevant to me, and I've already linked an article and a video that are more in line with my thoughts on the matter.

Bottom line though, this isn't an ethics thing, this is about two different rights.  Freedom of Speech, Kotaku's right to publish whatever they want.  And Freedom of Association - Bethesda and Ubisoft's right to associate with whomever they desire.   This isn't about writers sleeping with people they cover, covering ex/current roommates, or taking money from Publishers/Devs for favorable reviews.  The claim here is that because Kotaku chose to reveal two titles that hadn't been announced yet, those Pubs decided not to do business with them any longer.  Both actions are ethically and legally allowed.

this; developers have no obligation or reason to automatically share private development information with these gaming news companies, especially when some of them abuse it

when a site like Kotaku is releasing leaked gaming development information from a source that likely illegally obtained it or shared it (all employees at these companies sign non disclosure agreements) then they are acting unethically

I'm tired of this nonsense where a lot of people act as if gamers deserve to know everything that's happening behind closed doors at development software companies. YOU DONT. 

it's a previlage for a company like Bethesda or Ubisoft to send you early information, demos, interviews- not some sort of gurantee. there's been a lot of fishy stuff that has went on at Kotaku and when big developers as well as giant companies like SONY aren't working with Kotaku at times then that says a lot