kowenicki said:
They cited "sources" as "indicating". That couldnt ever be proven to be a lie. But in any event it wouldnt increase their share price. Either game sales are falling or digital is increasing, neither is good for them. |
Didn't open the speach... but wasn't the citing MS source?
And of course their spin could be on considering 35% digital rate in the same "neighbourhood" as 20-25%... which would in this case give very different numbers... even thought it's just 10-15 percentual points, it would be 40-75% increase, which is massive.
We can't be sure.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







