| Derek89 said: Maybe it's because I'm not well informed on the matter, but I don't understand why it has always been like that. If before it was the man who had full controll of the family income, wouldn't it make more sense that the father should get on the boat with the child? |
Chivalry, that why it was this way. The old way of thinking that men should protect women and child that so happens to be a good way of act and a usual instinct among animals: to protect the future of the species with the childs and women, because 1 men can get pregnant many women at the same time, but not the only way around.
OT: Why can't kids seat on their mother's (or father's) legs like has been happening since the invention of seats and save everybody? 
Now seriously, I agree with childs first, but then neither all the women nor 50/50. We should save the more capable ones.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







