Maybe it's because I'm not well informed on the matter, but I don't understand why it has always been like that. If before it was the man who had full controll of the family income, wouldn't it make more sense that the father should get on the boat with the child?
I picked Let the 100 man get in option just to oppose male disposability, but honestly, I would pick an option that is not there. Get the children on first, with both of their parents, and then those without children, first come first serve law, and if that can't be followed by the chaos, then those who can get themselves on a boat should be on a boat..
If someone tries to avoid helping myself in saving my own life for some traditionalist "old fashioned" BS, that someone will get a quick K.O beating.
I find really strange that a man saving his own life instead of saving a woman's is considered shameful. My life isn't worth less nor I owe it to some random woman just because I'm a male.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
