NewBeginning on 22 November 2015
Sounds to me like everyone needs to read the article in question in full. Most of you clearly haven't.
They're not 'angry' about being blacklisted. They're explaining their reasoning for the leaks, and the reasons for some of their late reviews. All of which are justified in my opinion. They've also been rallying against review embargoes, which are fairly anti-consumer. None of you can possibly be apologist enough to the point where you sympathize with publishers over review embargoes.
