By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 21 November 2015
Edit Thread
JRPGfan said:
Hiku said:

It's funny, therefore it's ok, apparently.

Personally I don't think it's gonna change much. But it does looks pretty disrespectful.

I also saw the swedish Xbox Twitter account tweet this out:




The marketing for Star Wars is in full force on Xbox One.


Sony should ask for a refund :p

Marketing exlusive obviously isnt, and unless companys start pursueing legal actions against it, why should anyone pay for exclusive marketing deals?


And some will say this ad from MS doesn't in any way crap over the exclusive deal... because it's a X1 advertisment and some games included for a price, too bad someone put the boxart of the game in the ad. Far as I know those kind of copyrighted material needs approval before being used. But nonetheless "smart MS move" I guess.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."