By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bryank75 said:
yvanjean said:


I think it's funny! Especially that Sony paid to get advertising on a game that's playable first on Xbox One.


From the perspective of someone who has no investment. Of course it would be funny, now imagine you spent money on that deal.....

Imagine you bought the deal that they had the previous 2 years and you respected that and didn't interfere in any way, but then when it was your turn they turned around and shit all over your deal.... 

Not really a nice mentality, is it?

Which can impact on future willingness of Sony to make those deals and if MS is the only one bidding they will probably pay less or seeing that they can get away with "clever" ways to advertise without authorization they may not even do it, and the publisher that stayed out of it may lose that money.

And about EA Access that is another bullocks part on Sony marketing team. this isn't the first game that they get exclusive marketing, but releases several days before on X1 because of EA Access....

I woul much preffer these money invested in new games.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."