By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
AlfredoTurkey said:
I think it's criminal to even be allowed to HAVE exclusive marketing. It's completely BS and should be legally blocked in court.


This, I find exclusive marketing to be highly dubious and deliberately misleading in general, this gen is especially worse for marketing rights because you have plenty of comments as an example on Youtube that constantly ask "is this on X platform too?". Because of that type of deceptive marketing, people don't always know that said games are available on other platforms, even at the same time and that affects the casual crowd as well as some who try to stay informed, for myself I always look up a game I'm interested is to know if it's on PC or when it would than relying on bought advertising to tell me what platform it's on.

That said I'm finding the reactions in this thread to play out like they always typically will, MS are once again up to their sneaky and highly devilish ways on trying to one up Sony but good guy Sony is the saint, the second coming that has and can do no wrong because they have never sinned or earned redemption decades ago. The same scenario is going to play out hundreds of times this entire gen and maybe even the next, nothing is going to change the canvas people have painted on.


Why is it specially bad this gen, but wasn't on the previous one?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."