By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tachikoma said:
Hankoney said:

I understand now, and am really sorry I tried to offer a perspective that is not based solely on some past grudges completely unrelated to either Crash or Activision.

What in the heck are you going on about, burek?

You guys were talking about Crash. You said: "As far as I know, Activision still owns the IP, so if it ever did make a return It would likely be multi-platform anyway unless a deal was struck with Sony. (A deal I would consider anti-consumer)"

I was just trying to say that the game is obviously not being made, because Activision would surely have made it by now if they wanted to. And that if someone were to make the game but it came to only one platform it would actually be pro-consumer because the game is being made.

There are many examples, maybe the best and lates being Bayonetta 2. I think it would be more anti-consumer if that game was never made at all, and if people enjoy that game then they should play it on a console that wanted to make it.

So all you did was start your own speculation and then tried to paint any possible deal as anti-consumer because reasons.

You say that any deal that would bring the game forward would be anti-consumer, I say that any deal that would bring the game forward would only be beneficial to consumers.

End of story.