By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mummelmann said:
padib said:
There's bias, that part is obvious.


Would you like to point out the obvious bias in the reviews for these three titles in the OP?

Easily

20 from Digital Spy

"It's fitting that the only Wii U-specific feature Devil's Third uses is the GamePad's poor battery life, because it gives you an excuse to turn it off."

Obvious derision of Wii U. 

 

40 from Multiplayer.it

"Devil’s Third is just terrible in every aspect, an ugly and broken action game that ends up being one of the worst Wii U exclusive ever released."

Like I said before, game is not broken. Chapter 5 is one of the most beautiful location in vidiya.


35 from IGN

"With weak combat, useless violence, and pay-to-win multiplayer, Devil's Third is not worth your time."

>useless violence

What? How can violence be useful?

>pay-to-win multiplayer

Blatant lie. You get rewards literally from everything in game.

 

30 from XGN

"With an unoriginal storyline, boring weapons, inconsistent frame rate and unfairly difficult bosses."

Wow, bunch of casuals whining about bosses (which are pretty easy even on "Hardcore" mode).

 

4 from Destructoid review:

"Fatal Frame: Maiden of Black Water seems so, so tired. Maidens, rituals, sacrifices, suicides, water, black hair growing and covering every surface...we've seen all of this done before and with more skill."

"If this what Fatal Frame is now, I don't want it anymore."

Fatal Frame is all about maidens, rituals, sacrifices, suicides, etc. If you not like it, you shouldn't review this game and you can't give it 4 only because you expect something else from this game.