By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fireburn95 on 18 November 2015
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
fireburn95 said:


It's called being realistic. If sony could get ps1 & ps2 on shit ps3 architecture, and ms can get 360 on xb1, you don't think it's at least feasible sony could've got ps1 & 2 at the very least on ps4. If you didn't realise, this is a business where the goal is to make money, not to cater to fans whims. Microsoft could've brought BC earlier, but they didn't expect the uphill battle they'd have to climb

Im not arguing its not possible, Im arguing Sony doesent care to add BC because they simply dont care. Youre right, Sony is driven on profits not fan requests.

MS could have brought BC ealier? Was the emulator ready before 2015?

Sony could be bringing good games to PS4. But they simply arent ready. It takes years to do that apparently.


'simply dont care' yes because it's easy to pin down decisions buy billion dollar conglomerates to 'don't care' You come off as really irrational.

Every company is driven off making money, you're smart enough to know that. Microsoft now is what sony were last gen.
Free online, ps plus free games etc.
Because they were the underdogs. Now MS are the underdogs....SURPRISE :O
EA Access free games, BackCompat

it's business at the end of the day, user retention, install base etc. and doesn't boil down to whether a company is 'lazy' or 'doesnt care'.

Yes, they could've, if they really wanted to. But they need people buying the consoles at this point moreso than the software, so they pile on the value-added services. A company as smart as microsoft could figure it out in a matter of days, it's their own effing hardware, if anyone knows it, they do.

Well the last line makes you look like a troll. Which is a shame as how you seemingly seem to come off as rational. Oh yeah how was the first 9 months for xbox one retail exclusives again? Oh yeah screamride, excellent game (psst not an exclusive)}
GG