60Fps - is it really that important?

[naruball]

MikeRox said:

naruball said:

Just watched it and though you're right, there is a noticeable difference, it by no means makes it a completely different game, hence why I still think that that statmement is complete BS. If DMC was an unplayable mess, then sure. But at 30fps it plays great. At 60fps it plays a little better. I gave the ps3 version a 9.5 and I'd give the remaster a 9.5 as well.

Which statement was bs? Do you mean the thread topic? Or something I said?

I think frame rate is very personal. To me, I find it much easier to get engrossed in 60fps games as I find the frame rate a bit jarring at 30fps. But I also understand that many other people don't really notice a difference unless they're looking for it. It also isn't a game destroyer as some make it out to be. Many of my favourite games of all time were 30fps. Doesn't stop me from forever wishing they were 60fps haha.

I'm now lucky enough to have a PC that can run most games at 60fps. So I'm actually playing through quite a lot of 7th gen software that was 30fps only on console and finding for me personally, it has a new lease of life. DMC is actually one of the games :) (hey, Capcom humble bundle is a far better price than the PS4/XB1 remaster eh!?)

Whoops. Sorry, I guess I should have been clearer. I meant the statement about the DMC remaster being a completely different game than the ps3/xb360 version. I mean I get that some notice the difference more than others, but come on!