hunter_alien said:
No, I dont want that but 1080p with accveptable performance on ultra settings is a must. I am not a graphics whore, otherwise I wouldent game on consoles, but graphical fidelity is one of the few reasons I still like to put PC's to the limit. Calling what I wrote blatantly false, is pretty much admitting that console quality is perfectly acceptable for PC gamers, while that can actually be called out, judging by the reponse many PC gamers have on this and other forums. |
There are many more reasons to game on PC than graphics. My games don't look much better than console games on my $650 PC, but they sure run much better. I don't have the stuttering problesm of Fallout 4, and I can run the game at a decent 50-60 fps with high/ultra settings. But what really appeals to me is that I can get the bugs fixed and graphics improved with mods. I can try out the creative endeavors of others without publishers limiting them. I can choose which ever control scheme I want. I can prioritize framerate in my games or visuals. It is my choice. PC gaming isn't just about visuals, and for me that is my least priority, although it is a nice bonus to have all my games run at 1080p, while console gamers have to compromise image quality and still have worst performance.