By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
JEMC said:
^Kind of meh, to be honest.

I would have preferred one of the true DQ games, to be honest. But if it's a sign that the next DQ games will also launch on PC...

Yeam same, I would have gone for a more up to date CT though.

 

Also I dunno if I should order that AOC monitor you linked me just yet, I mean I did get my refund back from SCAN (I don't think they refunded the insurance or possibly the P&P though) and was thinking of going for that AOC but then I was thinking back to that news you psoted a week ago on Nvidia GPU's being used at max with 144Hz monitors.

I just want a GSYNC monitor to keep my frames consistent though since VSYNC is just god awful to use and not many games support full screen border window mode and of course not using VSYNC means screen tearing =P.

I'm also a bit iffy about my i5-4670k being able to fully take on Fallout 4 on ultra settings even though I have the 980 and 8 gigs ram needed. Fallout seems to be one of those games that are more CPU based, Planetside 2 being another.

You're free to buy whatever you want. I just found the monitor you had ordered on stock somewhere else.

But not buying the monitor because of that bug is going too far, imho. First of all, Nvidia is working in a fix, and then there's the fact that you can still use the monitor at 120Hz without having the power draw problem. Yes, 144Hz sounds fancier, but will you notice the difference between 120 and 144HZ?

And in regards to Fallout 4 and your CPU, pcgameshardware.de (in german) did look into that, and in a CPU bound scenario found that the game scales well and will use all 4 cores. So it's more likely that you'll find yourself being GPU limited than CPU limited.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.