mornelithe on 13 November 2015
| SpokenTruth said: If any of you make a decision to no longer purchase the game based on this decision, I pity you. You take the principle of self-censorship as a greater evil over the objectification and subjugation of an entire gender. |
No, you take the principle of a function you don't have to use, as a reason to self-censor, I pity you. Gaming is not obligatory, a function in a game you disagree with, is not obligatory, your personal preference is not relevant to anyone else, in the world. And for the record, I wouldn't have used the function, even if I owned a Wii U. It's not interesting to me.
What is interesting to me is this objectification you're so concerned with, for only one gender. Which is very typical of this debate. Butchering male children is fine, divorce law inequality is fine, 92%+ of workplace deaths, and 3 of 4 suicides being male is fine. But hey, you keep on tooting that non-obligatory functionality in a fictional world horn.
