Rise of the Tomb Raider Reviews Meta 86

[Snoopy]

walsufnir said:

Abun said:

Nem said:

Sony did it in the past so many times. I can't blame Microsoft for doing it, but its not like i like it. But, business is business. This is not the state, its companies. You have no rights and they laugh at principles (look at all those shady/overpriced DLC deals). 

I have never seen Sony pay to delay a game on another system,but this is about TR and I don't want to make this Sony vs MS and their money hat deals.My issue is with Square who made the decision,but some people just had to defend MS as if their life depended on it.Ayway I was only going to make that one comment until some defenders threw on the cape.A deal is a deal,but we all have the right to criticise it.Only sheep would just ignore it.

 

Well, but that is only your problem and not the people you are arguing with. Sony did it in the past and it's been quite obvious. And especially for Tomb Raider but your attitude is already "I am right because I say so" so there is not much use of a further discussion.

OT: Very good reviews, I enjoyed the reboot a lot and it seems they could even improve. Now I wait for DF for the tech thread :)

Sony isn't really in a position to spend a lot of money. The only reason why sf5 is exclusive is because Microsoft didn't want to fund their own version and rather work on their own ips. Tomb raider was bought simply for holiday sales and was to compete against uncharted. Honestly, Microsoft should see if they can purchase the ip since they want their own "Uncharted" and obviously square enix isn't that confident in the series or else they wouldn't take Microsoft's offer.