By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
A_C_E said:
Abun said:

So basically we should ignore all of the flaws,which far outweigh the good points just because the reviewer enjoys the game?Any broken game can not be a 9/10 period.O ejnoyed Skyrim,but would not give it a 9/10.

Ignore them? Nope. Look past them? Slightly. Your entitlement as a gamer should reflect your view of everything offered by the game. I would classify Fallout 4 as an 8 or maybe a 9 out of 10 because at the end of the day bugs and glitches are a minor disturbance to an otherwise almost perfect game. The game has done what it set out to do which is more than most games/entertainment properties can say for themselves. My score would be based on the game, not just the glitches within the game(although they can be annoying).

It's too easy to nitpick a large, choice driven, hugely customizable, quest filled open world game. Too easy. It's about the cumulative fun you have with the game; how well you take the bad with the good. You might say the bad is just too bad and to that I say, too bad for you.

Here we go with the excuses again about how open the game is.Maybe they should get rid of some of those choices,customization and openess in favor of a better designed game that actually has an interesting story,good gameplay and smooth framerate? FO was never good from my experiences which were the last two and 4 looks no better.FO has not done anything more than other games that play better,look better,run better and are better designed.I have to disagree with you there,as quality games must be well designed.