| PieToast said: People who can accept or ignore these performance issues can coexist with the people who don't. Don't direct your frustration on the fans, criticise the developers, call them on their short comings because that might lead to healthy discussion. Otherwise, you're intentionally opening a can of worms in an attempt to shame the people who will enjoy the game. |
I want to quote this post for emphasis.
If we had a thread where we could talk about the technical problems of the Fallout and Elder Scroll series, that would be great and I'd be all for it. I remember doing that on the forum I was on before I came here, though it was a non-gaming forum with a small gaming section.
However, here we have to deal with the same crowd up pop up in every Bethesda thread and say the same old, "omg its broken bethesfsda paid off jim sterling and ign and gamespot the hole game is 0 fps omg omg." You can't have a decent discussion when it starts out at such ridiculous levels and it's always the same people who ruin that potential. It's frustrating.
Pretty much every reviewer who gave Fallout 4 a good review explained why they gave it a good review; because they had a blast playing the game despite the techinical short-comings. That's not a game that's broken. Now, if you're a person who can't deal with those problems, that's perfectly fine, but don't go acting like you represent everyone else.
