zero129 said:
Ruler said:
Azzanation said:
While PC runs the game at 60 frames. These machines got old very quickly, we still get games render under 30 frames isn't what I call next gen experience.
Just to add the XB1 handles the effects better like Fire, Smoke and Blood the PS4 drops in frames, claimed by DF @4:00. How come you didnt mention this in your thread?
|
Yeah these consoles cant handle last gen looking graphics @30fps? Look at dragon age, bloodborne, witcher 3 or mgs5 all of these games have better graphics, are open world and perform better than fallout 4.
Bethesda is just a horrible devoloper when it comes to consoles, just like rocksteady studio is for PC. To be honest they are a horrible devoloper in general when it comes to graphics or do they look a lot better on PC?
|
No, Rocksteady is a pretty good pc developer. The 3 or so man dev team that worked on porting Arkham knight to pc is to blame for that port not rocksteady..
And imo almost every 3rd party game looks alot better on pc. imo Comparing a PC 3rd party game to a ps4 version, the is a bigger difference in almost every case then the difference between comparing an X1 game to a PS4. And thats not even using a high end system.
|
Not really more frames doesnt change the poligons, effects or textures of a game. My point was is that the devolopers are to be blamed not the systems
