By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
VitroBahllee said:


Yeah, but the article also makes it clear investors were underwhelmed with the lame looking 'game,' which you've been arguing against in other threads.


Nope in the other thread this is flat out what I've told you, profits were speculated to be on the way due to an entry in mobile which has now been delayed. As he pointed out the value of stocks depends on expected profits so a delay in these profits means the price would drop meaning a number of current holders weren'te going to make their speculated return. The smart move is to sell while the stock is still overweight before the market corrects itself to reflect the speculated profit not turning up, that way you make money because as he pointed out stocks are short term (in other words they fluctuate like I told you).

You argued in the other thread about the quality of the app as a game which investors don't care about, they care about making money and were hoping for a microtransaction fest. In the other thread I said the stock was going to even out as well something you argued against, take notes from that guy quoted he has an idea of how stocks operate.

The "market" does care about the game because if it does not have confidence in the produc/game that is just as bad or worse than a delay- If the product the investors were counting on does not sell like the had hoped that not only delays profits and/or revenue growth it can cause losses (or less profits) 

So to say investos don t care about the game is wrong-  of course the care-

Additonally i have not seen any article or quote from stock analyst, investors ect that said they expcted Mario and micro transactions