| Semmie said: The amount of nintendo shillers here is just disgusting. Trying to refute someone and use the same argument against pvz. Its just silly. Both pvz and splatoon in essence are tps shooters. And yes comparing splatoon to an old indie game that literally the same is not bad at all. And so is comparing pvz to other tps shooters with similar physics even if it is from the late nineties. Opinions aside and tastes aside. Splatoon is a very short fast paced game which is highly addictive and can br put on anytime. So do i. But to call it one of the best games. LOL. U know its silly. I know u know. Its a highly marketed average game on a console which practically has no wide variaty of competetive fps tps. Yes theres smash or mk8. But fpstps all u got is cod and splatoon. U could count mass effect 3 if u want. Splatoon therefor becomes the only better option. Prove me wrong on that |
I think it's pretty obvious why you made this thread and never cared for an honest answer. As if PvZ: GW would all of a sudden sell Splatoon numbers if it was on the Wii U. It wouldn't as it's just a generic third person shooter. All the modes are straight up copied from other games. It's a been there, done that game with a barely active online community. It takes ages to find a match and a lot of modes are simply dead. That's not something you want from an online only game. Once the sequel comes out early next year this game will be dead.
Splatoon has a great future ahead of itself, PvZ: GW? Not so much. Splatoon isn't highly marketed, I've seen more PS4 ads on tv yesterday than Nintendo ads for the entire year.
"The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must" - Thoukydides
