I really enjoyed the read, it nice to find people who doesn´t believe just in pretty graphics, he clearly draws a line between marketing a game as the most beatiful graphical thing ever and marketing the game as a whole...
This game (KZ) is having almost the same effect as Crysis, looks great, but what about the gameplay, Crysis featured a nice concept with the nano-suit but poorly used in the final product...
Crysis was a boring walk in a beatifull jungle...
Killzone hype relies most in the graphics, and the constan hype from this front makes me believe in a poor general game (at this point), delays, outsourcing IA, photoshoped pics, etc
Yes, looks great, and features a nice animation and destructive enviroments, but what about the rest of the stuff.... what about the rest of the game...
And I´m not really bashing the game, since its not out there yet, but I´m wondering about the status of the game...








