Like this is in any way a discussion that can be objectively had by looking at screenshots. I always chuckle at this. Someone posts a bunch of screenshots; and? What does that proove?
The only way to be objective about a game's visual appeal is to look at raw numbers and nothing else, in which Zelda U obviously loses to any and all games on PS4 because the WiiU can't make numbers that are as high as PS4's.
However, you're not seeing numbers on your screens are you? You're looking at the art. It's the art that makes a game look good. It's the art that makes me able to say; "The 16-bit, over 20 years old Yoshi's Island looks better than Bloodborne." Which is a true statement to me. Nobody can argue that with me, and nobody could argue if I would say Zelda U looks better than 'X' PS4 game, because I'd be talking about what I see on the screen and how that subjectively meets my personal tastes. The numbers behind that could help a game's visuals meet those subjective personal tastes, but that's all.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I wished people would get that for a change.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
