Ratchet & Clank vs Star Fox Zero

[pastro243]

Alkibiádēs said:

pastro243 said:

 

You are making it sound like this was "GTA5" vs "Flower"

Why would Sony spend huge amounts of money on a super AAA game just to sell it at 40 bucks? Admit it, R&C is an average investment, they are just using that money in a good way. It even sounds more reasonable to think the game is a tie in for the movie and not the other way around 

With graphics like that I doubt it's an average investment. The levels are all pretty huge as well and the physics/animations are top notch. Even the bosses have dance moves when you use that one weapon! Compared to Star Fox, the difference in budget and development time is pretty big yes. Also making movies of that animated quality is very expensive, so this isn't an average investment at all. But hey, I don't know the length of the upcoming R & C game, it might be very short. The movie and game are supposed to advertise each other. This isn't your usual movie tie-in game, those are usually terrible. The movie is based of the game, not the other way around.

Average investment in the game, not the movie. I bet more money will go to the movie(Movie is supposed to have 25 million in budget, not a huge amount anyways). Lets stop pretending this game has production costs as high as a pixar movie or an Uncharted game, since if it was like that, charging 40 bucks would make no sense.  

Oh, and both the movie and this game (A re-imagining) are based on the series, not the movie on this particular game.