| MotherBound said: *Star Fox tries out new ideas and uses new innovative concepts *Fans bash it and ask for a traditional Star Fox *Traditional Star Fox revealed *Fans complain it doesn't like innovative |
To be fair, the complaints about SFZero are that we're getting a graphically-poor "not" remake of Star Fox 64, which was in itself a "not" remake of Star Fox. We've played the Lylat Wars scenario too many times for people to care that it's traditional Star Fox. If this were a remake of Star Fox 2, cool, awesome actually. The fact that we're getting stuff from Star Fox 2 like the walker is awesome too. But it's not awesome enough to be the focal point of E3, it's not awesome enough for them to have completely ignored multiplayer, etc. Traditional doesn't have to mean uninspired.
Of course, if the delay was chiefly to add multiplayer and fix the game up a tiny bit visually, perfect! That still doesn't change the fact that we're playing the same plot a third time for single player. If they do more than enough to differentiate, perfect! But right now Star Fox fans have every right to complain, because this is currently the second time I can truly say I 100% feel that Nintendo is just shitting out a game to have one. (The first is Mario Tennis Ultra Smash.)
You should check out my YouTube channel, The Golden Bolt! I review all types of video games, both classic and modern, and I also give short flyover reviews of the free games each month on PlayStation Plus to tell you if they're worth downloading. After all, the games may be free, but your time is valuable!
