By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goatseye said:
HollyGamer said:
Actually after seeing Halo 5, this graphic isn't that bad, Halo 5 manage to have 60 FPS due to small open area, while this games have a longer distant view and almost unlimited open area and 30FPS is pretty understandable. Both seem using old gen shader type. And what i love with Fallout is there artistic retro future fiction, the same like bioshock games.

Good sly jab friend. However, shooters with story oriented themes and not exploration, should not be open world. I mean every knowledgeable gamer knows that.

And then you gonna see or have seen games with smaller hubs than Halo 5, that sacrifice the frame rate and gameplay progression for shiny and mostly insignificant graphics.

Sorry if i ofended your most wanted games, but did i complain on Halo 5 graphic, nope. Want i am trying to say both equally the same with simplistic graphic. The difference is Halo optimizing on 60 FPS and small area, while the reason Fallout 4 having 30 FPS due the the masive open world content they have. Is like comparing Forza 5 with Forza Horizon 2, one is 60 FPS and the other is 30FPS.