Machiavellian said:
Then she stays in that seat!!! Already answered the defy parent part. You can why me to death but tell me why would their ever be a need for such a violent result for a non-violent situation. Why do you feel that violence was the needed action for this situation and why would we not exhaust any non-violent scenarios before such force is ever needed. The key is that the situation was never violent to ever need that result on a kid.
|
Then let every student execise their "right" to stay and/or go wherever they want and how they want to disrupt the fabric of civil society and parenting norms. That's the pandora's box YOU are opening up. And I never said violence was the only means that would have difused the situation. It was the student that proved that the actions taken was at least one viable solution. Remember, she originaly resisted and continued to resist more and more. It was all her. And if you asked twenty people for non-violent solutions and received twenty different solutions, trying all twenty solutions in this case of reality goes beyond human reasoning and into the realm of insanity. It will show how much students have control over the education system as they can manipulate rules and regulation to disrupt the flow of order and education in the public education system. You wouldn't get anything done, thus defeating the purpose of an education system.
