|
Alkibiádēs said: The PS1 was Sony's first console, they had no idea it was going to dominate like that. So using the PS1 as an example that monopoly doesn't hurt the game industry doesn't make any sense. Sony had to take their competitors into account before building and releasing their console. In fact, Playstation wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for Nintendo. It's not a valid point at all like I explained above. PS2 was weaker than the XBOX and GC and was harder to develop for. It was also more expensive than the GC. The XBOX had a much better online infrastructure and that influenced Nintendo and Sony to try harder with their online infrastructure. Although Nintendo still is stubborn when it comes to online infrastructure. Sony has copied MS's idea of putting online behind a paywall. Remember the disastrous announcement of the XBONE at E3 2013? MS had to ditch most of their ideas because of the backlash. If they had a monopoly on the market we, the gamers, would have been screwed. Just about every real-life example would disagree with you. Monopoly leads to stagnation. Maybe not right away, but eventually it will lead to that. |







