LudicrousSpeed said:
As a consumer why do I care what Sony is losing per unit sold? All I care about is what they are charging me, and what I get for that price. Thankfully they fixed that. |
because they would have royalties from the sales made on the system as a role?
Oww so sony is a bad company when dominating because they charged you too much for what you wanted to pay, no matter it was underpriced... ok understand. Guess Ferrari if was taking a loss would also be very bad for its customer because there are people that think it's still too high. You compare MS anti-customer decisions to Sony pricy console, yeah those are really up on the same ballpark, and PS2 dominating a lot was surely very bad for customers.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







