| mZuzek said: Wasn't Emily Rogers the person who made that really crappy article before Star Fox got announced at E3 2014 about how Star Fox could never work in this day and age or something like that? If that's the case, she really doesn't have any credibility to me. I don't care what you consider to be too arcadey or outdated, Star Fox 64 is one of the best games I've ever played and Star Fox Zero is looking like it's going to be a solid evolution to that. I'm sure it will be as amazing as, if not more, than SF64, and that's all I care about, because it's the first game to give that experience in almost 20 years. I love the $20 outdated arcade rail shooter. |
She was right. It couldn't work in this day and age. She has the ultimate credibility. Even as a successor to SF64, it doesn't look good. It's not even doing a good job at being derivative. I don't understand how you can like SF64 and think Zero could possibly match up to it with what we've been shown. It doesn't even look like an evolution of that specific kind of on-rails gameplay - it looks like a convoluted downgrade.
