kappie1977 said:
I understand your point, but I think that it's even the otherway around that USA is the more dangarous country. They are not acting/involving in issues if they can't gain or get controll over a region. No country govnerment would just attact a certain dictator because it's for the people of that country! If you really think that any country would do that you are pretty naive. Ofcourse the govnerment wants us to be for involvement, so they do all kind of propoganda to convince you, your country needs to be involved! |
I did make that point. There are definitly economic interests at play. The US is not always right at all. But i don't think a world without the US would be a better world. It would become a more dangerous one. Even with economic interests, they are deterrents for bigger threats. Small countries and how they intervene is highly debatable and i'm not defending it in any way. I'm just against isolitionism because that was an enabler for large wars to happen in the past.







